Inaccurate/solved

the following is my code including two SDPs

the answer of the second SDP is “Inaccurate/Solved”

%%%%%%%%%%%%%% code
clc
clear all
close all

%% 测量点位置

xShip=15*[100;0;-100;-100;-100;0;100;100];
yShip=15*[100;100;100;0;-100;-100;-100;0];
zShip=0; % 发射换能器的入水深度

%% 目标位置
xTar=400randn;
yTar=400
randn;
zTar=0;

%% 添加测量误差
detat=10.001; % 时延测量误差
tb=5
0.001;

c=1500;
cb=5; % 声速测量的固定偏差

detaa=1; % 节点位置的随机误差
xShipMea=xShip+detaarandn(size(xShip));
yShipMea=yShip+detaa
randn(size(yShip));

tMea=sqrt((xShip-xTar).^2+(yShip-yTar).^2+(zShip-zTar).^2)/c+detat*randn(size(xShip))+tb;

%% 求解
Qt=detat^2*(ones(length(tMea)-1)+eye(length(tMea)-1));

tdoa=tMea(2:end)-tMea(1);

M=length(tMea);

A=[-ones(M-1,1),eye(M-1)];

G=eye(M-1)-(tdoatdoa’/Qt)/(tdoa’/Qttdoa);

S=[xShipMea’;yShipMea’];

%% 第一阶段 把节点位置当作真值 SDR 估计c0
cvx_begin sdp
variable D1(M,M);
variable d1(M);
variable u(2,1);
variable ys;
minimize(trace(D1A’G’/QtGA));
subject to

[1 d1’;d1 D1]==semidefinite(M+1);

[eye(2) u;u’ ys]==semidefinite(3);

D1(M,M)-ys+2*u’*S(:,M)-S(:,M)‘S(:,M)==0;
for ii=1:M-1
D1(ii,ii)-ys+2
u’*S(:,ii)-S(:,ii)'*S(:,ii)==0;

for jj=ii+1:M
    D1(ii,jj)-abs(ys-u'*(S(:,ii)+S(:,jj))+S(:,ii)'*S(:,jj))>=0;
end

end

cvx_end

d1e=sqrt((u(1)-S(1,:)‘).^2+(u(2)-S(2,:)’).^2);
c0=(tdoa’/QtAd1e)/(tdoa’/Qt*tdoa);

%% 第二阶段 将节点位置的随机测量误差考虑在内 SDR
Ratio=[10^(-7),10^(-6),10^(-5),10^(-4)];
W=detaa^(-2)*eye(M);
for kk=1:length(Ratio)

cvx_begin sdp
variable d2(M,1);
variable D2(M,M) ;
variable X(2,M+1);
variable Y(M+1,M+1);
minimize 1/c0^2*trace(D2*A'*G'/Qt*G*A)-2*trace(W*X(:,2:M+1)'*S)+trace(W*Y(2:M+1,2:M+1))+Ratio(kk)*trace(D2)
subject to

[1 d2';d2 D2]==semidefinite(M+1);

[eye(2) X;X' Y]==semidefinite(M+3);

for ii=1:M
    D2(ii,ii)-Y(1,1)+2*Y(1,ii+1)-Y(ii+1,ii+1)==0;
    norm(X(:,1)-X(:,ii+1))-d2(ii) <= 0;
end

for ii=1:M-1
    for jj=ii+1:M
        D2(ii,jj)-abs(Y(1,1)-Y(1,ii+1)-Y(1,jj+1)+Y(ii+1,jj+1)) >= 0;
    end
end

cvx_end

u2(:,kk)=X(:,1);

d2e=sqrt((X(1,1)-S(1,:)').^2+(X(2,1)-S(2,:)').^2);
c2=(tdoa'/Qt*A*d2e)/(tdoa'/Qt*tdoa);

J(kk)=(tdoa*c2-A*d2e)'/Qt*(tdoa*c2-A*d2e);

end

pos=find(J==min(J));

xFinal=u2(1,pos);
yFinal=u2(2,pos);

%%%%%%%%%%%%

the following is the result





Can the solution result be considered correct in this situation?

You will have to judge whether the solution is good enough for your purposes.

However, try to improve the numerical scaling so that input data and the objective value are within a small number of orders of magnitude of 1, which they are not currently. 2.7e7 is a very large magnitude for an objective function. Perhaps this will allow the problem to be solved to normal accuracy, rather than Inaccurate/solved.

thanks, but i do not quite understand the meaning of numerical scaling can you give me an example or some related materials?

Change the units used in the problem. For example, use kilometers instead of meters.

thanks, I change the units in my code and I get ‘Solved’.