Hope everyone is doing well.

I have a convex problem, but CVX provides me with NaN. Below, I present the solution table. Could anyone figure out where the problem is?

## Successive approximation method to be employed.

For improved efficiency, SeDuMi is solving the dual problem.

SeDuMi will be called several times to refine the solution.

Original size: 175 variables, 69 equality constraints

24 exponentials add 192 variables, 120 equality constraints

## Cones | Errors |

Mov/Act | Centering Exp cone Poly cone | Status

--------±--------------------------------±--------

21/ 21 | 8.000e+00 7.737e+00 0.000e+00 | Failed

21/ 21 | 8.000e+00s 8.535e+00s 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

16/ 16 | 8.000e+00 1.552e+01 0.000e+00 | Failed

13/ 13 | 8.000e+00 2.338e+01 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

21/ 21 | 8.000e+00 3.102e+01 0.000e+00 | Failed

18/ 18 | 8.000e+00 4.089e+01 0.000e+00 | Failed

13/ 13 | 8.000e+00 5.160e+01 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

13/ 13 | 8.000e+00s 5.982e+01s 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

20/ 20 | 8.000e+00 6.542e+01 0.000e+00 | Failed

16/ 16 | 8.000e+00 7.348e+01 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

16/ 16 | 8.000e+00s 8.243e+01s 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

13/ 13 | 8.000e+00 8.546e+01 0.000e+00 | Failed

17/ 17 | 8.000e+00 8.306e+01 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

16/ 16 | 8.000e+00 9.172e+01 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

16/ 16 | 8.000e+00s 1.002e+02s 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

15/ 15 | 8.000e+00 1.177e+02 0.000e+00 | Failed

22/ 22 | 8.000e+00 1.104e+02 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

10/ 10 | 8.000e+00 1.128e+02 0.000e+00 | Failed

19/ 19 | 8.000e+00 1.149e+02 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

18/ 18 | 8.000e+00 1.218e+02 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

17/ 17 | 8.000e+00 1.323e+02 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

17/ 17 | 8.000e+00s 1.415e+02s 0.000e+00 | Inaccurate/Solved

17/ 17 | 8.000e+00s 1.510e+02s 0.000e+00 | Failed

Status: Failed

Optimal value (cvx_optval): NaN